Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 BARO domains

From: Offense related characteristics and psychosexual development of juvenile sex offenders

 

Total group

N = 174

Solo offenders

N = 54

Group offenders

N = 90

Child molesters

N = 30

 

High/very high concern

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

χ 2 ; (2, N = 174); p

BARO offense

106

71.6

26

60.5 a

56

71.8 a, b

24

88.9 b

6.595; p < 0.05

BARO environment

65

43.9

16

37.2

34

43.6

15

55.6

2.274; .321

BARO development

54

37.0

16

38.1 a

21

27.3 a

17

63.0 b

10.957; p < 0.05

BARO externalizing

67

45.6

20

46.5

33

42.9

14

51.9

.673;.714

BARO internalizing

44

31.2

12

29.3 a

17

23.0 a

15

57.7 b

10.905; p < 0.05

BARO substance abuse

9

6.4

2

4.9

4

5.5

3

11.5

1.402; .496

BARO family

40

26.8

15

34.9 b

12

15.4 a

13

46.4 b

12.099; p < 0.05

BARO school

42

28.6

13

31.0

20

25.6

9

33.3

.745; .689

BARO leisure time

59

39.9

13

30.2

34

43.0

12

46.2

2.425; .297

  1. Note. Percents with same subscripts do not differ significantly at p < 0.05 by post-hoc 2 × 2 chi-square analysis.
  2. BARO: Global assessment of risk and protective factors