Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 School based studies included in analysis

From: Prevalence of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sl no. P.I.

year

State/UT

Setting

Age group

N

Prev. (%)

1. Jiloha [72]

1981

Haryana

rural

5-12

715

20.7

Used questionnaire (t) and reporting questionnaire for children (p), clinical interview. Diagnosis was made as per ICD-9.

2. Devsigamani [22]

1990

TN

urban

8-12

755

33.7

Rutter B scale was used as a screening instrument and diagnosis was made as per ICD- 9 after clinical interview.

3. Mehta [74]

1997

WB

rural

8-10

8-10

460

Rutter B scale (Hindi adaptation), Malin’s test of verbal intelligence, VSMS, Gessell’s drawing test were used. Diagnosis was made as per DSM-III-R.

4. Banerjee [75]

1997

WB

rural

8-10

460

33.33

Rutter’s B scale was used as screening instrument and ICD-9 was used to make the diagnosis

5. Gupta [73]

2001

Punjab

urban

9-11

957

45.6

Rutter’s B scale was used as screening instrument and ICD-10 was used to make the diagnosis

6. Malhotra [76]

2002

Chandigarh

urban

4-11

963

6.33

Rutter B scale, pre-school behaviour checklist, Childhood Psychopathology Measurement Schedule was used. Diagnosis was made as per ICD-10.

7. Bansal [77]

2011

Punjab

urban

10-15

982

20.2

Childhood Psychopathology Measurement Schedule was used and Diagnosis was made as per ICD-10.