Table 3 Results of the moderated mediation models

Model 1

PCC

Gender

0.01

0.05

0.19

[– 0.09, 0.11]

Age

– 0.03

0.03

– 1.17

[– 0.08, 0.02]

PI

– 0.15*

0.07

– 2.14

[– 0.29,– 0.01]

PPF

– 0.57***

0.03

– 21.92

[– 0.62,– 0.52]

PP

0.06*

0.03

2.46

[0.01, 0.12]

PPF × PP

0.06*

0.02

2.43

[0.01, 0.11]

R²

0.34***

F

90.55

IP

Gender

0.01

0.06

0.21

[– 0.10, 0.12]

Age

– 0.07**

0.03

– 2.68

[– 0.13,– 0.02]

PI

– 0.17*

0.08

– 2.22

[– 0.32,– 0.02]

PPF

– 0.12***

0.03

– 3.62

[– 0.19,– 0.06]

PP

0.07*

0.03

2.37

[0.01, 0.13]

PCC

0.32***

0.03

9.38

[0.25, 0.39]

PPF × PP

– 0.02

0.03

– 0.7

[– 0.07, 0.03]

R²

0.19***

F

36.29

Model 2

PCC

Gender

0.01

0.05

0.19

[– 0.09, 0.11]

Age

– 0.03

0.03

– 1.17

[– 0.08, 0.02]

PI

– 0.15*

0.07

– 2.14

[– 0.29,– 0.01]

PPF

– 0.57***

0.03

– 21.92

[– 0.62,– 0.52]

PP

0.06*

0.03

2.46

[0.01, 0.12]

PPF × PP

0.06*

0.02

2.43

[0.01, 0.11]

R²

0.34***

F

90.55

EP

Gender

– 0.16**

0.05

– 2.96

[– 0.27,– 0.05]

Age

– 0.05*

0.03

– 1.99

[– 0.11,– 0.00]

PI

– 0.07

0.08

– 0.96

[– 0.22, 0.08]

PPF

0.00

0.03

– 0.02

[– 0.07, 0.07]

PP

0.12***

0.03

4.13

[0.06, 0.17]

PCC

0.44***

0.03

13.22

[0.37, 0.50]

PPF × PP

– 0.02

0.03

– 0.77

[– 0.07, 0.03]

R²

0.24***

F

46.91

Conditional indirect effect: PPF→PPC→IP

β

SE

95% CI

M– 1 SD

– 0.20

0.03

[– 0.25,– 0.15]

M

– 0.18

0.02

[– 0.22,– 0.14]

M + 1 SD

– 0.16

0.02

[– 0.20,– 0.12]

Conditional indirect effect: PPF→PPC→EP

β

SE

95% CI

M– 1 SD

– 0.27

0.03

[– 0.33,– 0.22]

M

– 0.25

0.02

[– 0.29,– 0.21]

M + 1 SD

– 0.22

0.02

[– 0.27,– 0.18]