Skip to main content

Table 2 Generalized linear mixed models for the CBCL (disruptive behavior) and the competence scale of the DISYPS (prosocial behavior)

From: Effectiveness of group-based indicated prevention in children identified with disruptive behavior problems: results of an implementation study in the German health care system

 

Disruptive behavior problems CBCL

DISYPS-prosocial behavior

 

β

SE

t

p

95% CI

d

β

SE

t

p

95% CI

d

Model 1: NOR as reference

Constant

10.30

1.03

9.97

 <.001

8.27–12.33

 

27.48

0.90

30.54

 <.001

25.71–29.24

 

NOR

–

–

–

–

–

 

–

–

–

–

–

 

BA

13.81

0.72

19.31

 <.001

12.40–15.22

 

− 6.09

0.47

− 13.04

 <.001

− 7.01 to − 5.18

 

NO BA

6.93

1.74

3.98

 <.001

3.50–10.37

 

− 5.71

0.86

− 6.62

 <.001

− 7.41 to − 4.02

 

T0

–

–

–

–

–

 

–

–

–

–

–

 

T1

− 0.30

0.17

− 1.78

.076

− 0.63–0.03

 

0.17

0.14

1.16

.248

− 0.12–0.45

 

T2

− 3.54

0.23

− 15.50

 <.001

− 3.99 to − 3.09

 

0.30

0.17

1.77

.077

− 0.03–0.63

 

Interactions

BA*T1

− 3.61

0.66

− 5.50

 <.001

− 4.90 to − 2.32

–0.55

1.67

0.45

3.74

 <.001

0.79–2.55

0.32

BA*T2

− 1.60

0.76

− 2.12

.035

− 3.09 to–0.11

− 0.24

1.12

0.48

2.35

.019

0.18–2.06

0.21

NO BA*T1

− 1.05

1.93

− 0.54

.588

− 4.84–2.75

 

2.08

1.20

1.74

.085

− 0.29–4.45

 

NO BA*T2

− 3.46

3.27

− 1.06

.297

− 10.09–3.18

 

0.73

2.25

0.32

.750

− 3.90–5.35

 

Age of child

− 0.56

0.09

− 5.97

 <.001

− 0.74 to − 0.38

 

0.36

0.07

4.80

 <.001

0.21–0.51

 

Sex of child

1.04

0.35

2.95

.003

0.35–1.73

 

− 1.71

0.03

− 5.65

 <.001

− 2.30 to − 1.12

 

Monthly income

− 0.18

0.11

− 1.63

.103

− 0.39–0.04

 

0.07

0.08

0.83

.406

− 0.09–0.23

 

Constant

17.23

1.93

8.94

 <.001

13.44–21.02

 

21.76

1.20

18.29

 <.001

19.42–24.10

 

NO BA

–

–

–

–

–

 

–

–

–

–

–

 

NOR

− 6.93

1.74

− 3.98

 <.001

− 10.37 to − 3.50

 

5.71

0.89

6.62

 <.001

4.02–7.41

 

BA

6.90

1.85

3.72

 <.001

3.23–10.52

 

− 0.38

0.94

− 0.40

.689

− 2.24–1.48

 

T0

–

–

–

–

–

 

–

–

–

–

–

 

T1

− 1.34

1.92

− 0.70

.485

− 5.12–2.44

 

2.25

1.19

1.89

.061

− 0.10–4.60

 

T2

− 7.00

3.26

− 2.15

.039

− 13.62 to – 0.38

 

1.02

2.25

0.46

.652

− 3.60–5.63

 

Interactions

NOR*T1

1.05

1.93

0.54

.588

− 2.75–4.84

 

− 2.08

1.20

− 1.74

.085

− 4.45–0.29

 

NOR*T2

3.46

3.27

1.06

.297

− 3.18–10.09

 

− 0.73

2.25

− 0.32

.750

− 5.35–3.90

 

BA*T1

− 2.56

2.02

− 1.27

.206

− 6.54–1.42

 

− 0.41

1.26

− 0.32

.747

− 2.90–2.09

 

BA*T2

1.86

3.34

0.56

.582

− 4.91–8.62

 

0.40

2.29

0.17

.864

− 4.29–5.09

 

Age of child

− 0.56

0.09

− 5.97

 <.001

− 0.74 to − 0.38

 

0.36

0.07

4.80

 <.001

0.21–0.51

 

Sex of child

1.04

0.35

2.95

.003

0.35–1.73

 

− 1.71

0.03

− 5.65

 <.001

− 2.30 to − 1.12

 

Monthly income

− 0.18

0.11

− 1.63

.103

− 0.39–0.04

 

0.07

0.08

0.83

.406

− 0.09–0.23

 
  1. NOR Children that were screened as ‘normal’ according to the SDQ [53], BA Children who participated in “Baghira”, NO BA Children of families who refused participating in “Baghira” despite receiving a recommendation. T0: pre-intervention; T1: post-intervention. Regarding child’s sex, females were coded as 1, males as 2. Highlighted in bold are relevant interactions. Robust p-values were used and adjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction. Cohen’s d was calculated using the standard deviation of the outcome variable at T0 across all groups (CBCL: SD = 6.54; DISYPS: SD = 5.29). Cohen’s d of 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 represent small, medium and large effects, respectively [82]
Back to article page

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

ISSN: 1753-2000